The Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel (CARP) system was a part of the United States Congress involved in making decisions regarding copyright royalties.[1]
Panel function
The system itself was created upon the suggestion of the Register of Copyrights, and is sanctioned to appoint and organize copyright arbitration royalty panels. The primary purpose of the panel is to make decisions involving the adjustment of copyright royalty rates as well as the terms and payments of royalties that fall under copyright law.[2]
When determining the reasonable royalty rates, the Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel attempts to make the creative works accessible to the public, to grant the copyright holder a fair reward for the work, and to minimize any disruptive effects the industries involved or associated with the copyright holder and user. Additionally, arbitrary decisions are made concerning the adjustment of the copyright royalty rates by this group. [3]
The CARP was phased out by the Copyright Royalty and Distribution Reform Act of 2004, which amended chapter 8 of the U.S. Copyright Act in its entirety. Pub. L. No. 108-419, 118 Stat. 2341. Under the new system, three Copyright Royalty Judges, also known as CRJs, establish the conditions and rates for (compulsory) copyright statutory licenses, and govern the distribution system of royalties collected by the Copyright office on these statutory licenses. 17 U.S.C. Section 801.[4]
The CRJ appointees will serve for a full-time six-year term with the possibility for reappointment. In order to avoid replacing all three judges at the same time, the first three judges appointed will serve staggered terms of two, four, and six years. 17 U.S.C. Section 802.
See also
References
|
|---|
|
| Statutes | | Pre-1976 | |
|---|
| 1970s | |
|---|
| 1980s | |
|---|
| 1990s | |
|---|
| 2000s | |
|---|
| 2010s | |
|---|
| 2020s | |
|---|
|
|---|
Precedents and rulings | | Supreme Court |
- Wheaton v. Peters (1834)
- Baker v. Selden (1879)
- Trade-Mark Cases (1879)
- Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony (1884)
- Banks v. Manchester (1888)
- Callaghan v. Myers (1888)
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. Straus (1908)
- White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co. (1908)
- Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States (1975)
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. (1984)
- Feist v. Rural (1991)
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. (1994)
- Quality King v. L'anza (1998)
- Eldred v. Ashcroft (2003)
- MGM Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd. (2005)
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Omega, S. A. (2010)
- Golan v. Holder (2012)
- Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013)
- American Broadcasting Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. (2014)
- Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands (2017)
- Fourth Estate v. Wall-Street.com (2019)
- Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (2020)
- Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. (2021)
- Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (2023)
|
|---|
| Appeals courts |
- Berlin v. E.C. Publications, Inc. (2d Cir. 1964)
- Roth Greeting Cards v. United Card Co. (9th Cir. 1970)
- Eltra Corp. v. Ringer (4th Cir. 1978)
- Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates (9th Cir. 1978)
- Midway Manufacturing Co. v. Artic International, Inc. (7th Cir. 1983)
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp. (3d Cir. 1983)
- Fisher v. Dees (9th Cir. 1986)
- Whelan v. Jaslow (3d Cir. 1986)
- Vault Corp. v. Quaid Software Ltd. (5th Cir. 1988)
- Rogers v. Koons (2nd Cir. 1992)
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. (2d Cir. 1992)
- American Geophysical Union v. Texaco, Inc. (2nd Cir. 1995)
- Dr. Seuss Enters., L.P. v. Penguin Books USA, Inc.(9th Cir. 1997)
- Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc. (2d Cir. 1998)
- Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp. (9th Cir. 2000)
- Nunez v. Caribbean Int'l News Corp. (1st Cir. 2000)
- A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. (9th Cir. 2001)
- Veeck v. Southern Building Code Congress Int'l (5th Cir. 2002)
- Kelly v. Arriba Soft Corp. (9th Cir. 2002 / 2003)
- In re Aimster Copyright Litigation (7th Cir. 2003)
- NXIVM Corp. v. Ross Institute (2d Cir. 2004)
- BMG Music v. Gonzalez (7th Cir. 2005)
- Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley, Ltd. (2nd Cir. 2006)
- Blanch v. Koons (2nd Cir. 2006)
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (9th Cir. 2006)
- Cartoon Network, LP v. CSC Holdings, Inc. (2nd Cir. 2008)
- Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc. (9th Cir. 2010)
- Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. American Buddha (2d Cir. 2011)
- Monge v. Maya Magazines, Inc. (9th Cir. 2012)
- Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc. (2d Cir. 2012)
- Seltzer v. Green Day, Inc (9th Cir. 2013)
- Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc. (2d Cir. 2015)
- Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. (9th Cir. 2015)
- Naruto v. Slater (9th Cir. 2018)
|
|---|
| Lower courts |
- Folsom v. Marsh (C.C.D. Mass. 1841)
- Elektra Records Co. v. Gem Electronic Distributors, Inc. (E.D.N.Y. 1973)
- Broderbund Software Inc. v. Unison World, Inc. (N.D. Cal. 1986)
- Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Frena (M.D. Fla. 1993)
- Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. (S.D.N.Y. 1999)
- RealNetworks, Inc. v. Streambox, Inc. (W.D. Wash. 2000)
- Mannion v. Coors Brewing Co. (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
- Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLC (S.D.N.Y. 2010)
- Capitol Records, LLC v. ReDigi Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2013)
- Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2015)
- Hachette v. Internet Archive (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
- Universal Music Group v. Internet Archive (S.D.N.Y. 2023)
|
|---|
|
|---|
|